Search your Topic HERE....

July 12, 2013

An Important Message to the people who are not happy wiht the change in the eligibility norms of IBPS PO III 2013 - Dileep D Bhat

94 comments

sponsored links

Friends, Hope that all the aspirants would have noticed that recent Recruitment Notification published by IBPS :

“ADVERTISEMENT OF COMMON WRITTEN EXAMINATION [CWE] FOR RECRUITMENT OF PROBATIONARY OFFICERS/ MANAGEMENT TRAINEES IN PARTICIPATING ORGANISATIONS”.

They have made changes in eligibility criteria. 
  • The minimum educational qualification now is “ Degree (Graduation) with 60% marks for unreserved category. Earlier it was Degree (Graduation) in any discipline. 
  • Also Age has been changed to Minimum: 20 years Maximum: 28 years. Earlier this was Minimum: 20 years Maximum: 30 years. I myself has become a victim of this sort of a unpredictable move by IBPS. 

And these modifications made in eligibility criteria including increase in the percentage of marks and by reducing the age limit are really going to affect lakhs of people's lives who have been preparing for IBPS. Because they are suddenly became not eligible for this exam. So, one of our Friends, Mr. Dileep D Bhat from Kerala intends to file a writ petition in Kerala High Court demanding to restore the eligibility criteria as it was followed in the last few years. 

He already filed an RTI with IBPS to get details of the CWE PO 2 and got a reply of no avail.

So he humbly requests you to come forward and support him so that we can make fight against this unilateral move of IBPS which is adversely affecting a lot of unemployed people or aspirants who are in search of a Public Sector/Government job.

If you are interested or supporting please join your hands with Him. 

You can mail him for more details at dileepdbhat@yahoo.com, dileepdbhat@gmail.com

you can also contact him on his facebook  and  twitter.


94 comments:

  1. I m with u,soon i will mail u.ab kuch hoga.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Will try my level best....

      Delete
    2. PLEASE FARWARD THIS MESSAGE.....

      Plzzzz frnds Send this matter to ibpsp@ibps.in

      Subject:
      - Regarding IBPS P.O/MT -3 notification.

      ... Respected Sir,

      Talent varies person to person. But it is not depend on academic
      percentages of the students (Especially Banking Aspirants).Mostly the persons
      who ever appointed in banking sector from IBPS Initial Common Written exam
      stage to earlier recruited candidate doesn’t have 60 percentage in their
      graduation (Academic Career). It represents hard work, dedication, commitment
      of the banking aspirants. Even board of “UNION
      PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISION” also not
      expecting 60 percentage in the graduation (Academic Career) from their Civil
      Service Aspirants. Our Govt. suppose to reduce the unemployment. But Mr.
      Chidambaram, Kandhelwal Committee and Bank of Baroda former MD reducing the age
      limits of the banking aspirants and increasing the graduation percentages. Due
      to these new amendments of Govt. of India reducing
      the national employment and increasing the BELOW POVERTY LINE Families in the
      country so the Govt. should encourage the Banking aspirants and develop
      the employment in our nation in the way
      of earlier “IBPS P.O-2 NOTIFICATION(i.e.,
      Any Graduate without any percentage restriction and not more than 30 years of
      age for General merit category )” rules
      and regulations . Otherwise the respected Kandhelwal Committee and
      Chidambaram amendments suppose to pass these rules(IBPS P.O/MT-3) 3 years
      earlier itself. Now according to Lakhs of Banking aspirants it is not a right decision.
      Because of already banking aspirants kept enormous efforts in the way of
      Preparation for this notification. So we requesting to respected Mr.
      Chidambaram and Kandhelwal committee regarding to encourage the talented,
      dedicated and hardworking Banking aspirants. Please Modify the notification as
      similar to IBPS PO-2 notification regarding Age limit and Percentages.

      Humbly requesting
      Please do the needful,

      Thanking you sir,

      Yours
      Sincerely,

      Delete
  2. our friend (another website) has also launched a petition please support this petition
    www. change. org/en-IN/petitions/government-of-india-ministry-of-finance-department-of-financial-services-not-to-keep-a-criteria-of-60-marks-in-grad-for-hring-of-officers-in-psbs#share

    ReplyDelete
  3. PO is a officer post so 60% is suitable for it. Even every officer post like GIC AO, RRB OFFICER 'B GRADE, FCI management trainee and now Indian oversea bank PO all have minimum 60% CRITERIA and i don't think so anyone have any problem with this.so this is the good decision and i welcome it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Its your view....Many unemployed youths are adversely affected by this decision....

      Delete
    2. they also should set any degree.......percentage should not be ask...
      but all are preparing IBPS with aim.......so don't spoil their dreams......%age should reduce.........

      Delete
    3. @ rahul::wat u said is right but keep in mind that bank po is mass recruitment. for 25000 posts everyone should be given chance.that is the point. no body cares including me if rbi asks 60% for 100 posts or fci asks 60% for 300 posts. i think for upto 500-1000 posts this criteria can be justified.but why criteria for 25000 posts? please do not compare other exams to bank po.

      vacancy in bank po>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>total vacancies of various exam u have mentioned. hope u understand my logic

      Delete
    4. This is not a forum for those who welcome the move ........Welcome the move on the streets if you may but not on this forum .......

      Delete
    5. rahul if really have a competition spirit face competition vid second class guy . many aspirants who qualified in earlier notification this time not applicable .

      Delete
    6. I agree with Rahul...competition is competition whether it is for 100 or 25000..First class marks are mandatory...Atleast students study seriously in their graduation from now onwards...

      Delete
    7. Rahul n Raj.....U r correct at your point....But dont u feel it should have been notified earlier so that people focussing on IBPS po may have changed their strategy and focussed on something better...Its just like that u book a reserved ticket in a train from a small station and when u reach at station to catch d train on date of journey its announced that many big trains like rajdhani etc dont stop at this station so this station has been excluded from the route ....Try some other train.....

      Delete
    8. rahul y think about yourself, bcoz y afraid that if those 2nd or 3 rd class students appear the exam then it will more difficult for y to get a chance .Am i right, ?????????,so y think just like a child, y only see the light part but y dont want see the dark park.

      Delete
  4. is there any way we can highlight this issue so that national media will follow and make the goverment the bend over

    today on etv Bihar some students were lathi charged when they were agitating against this new criteria

    please anyone if you have some links with media personnel those who can focus on our issue nationally it will help us

    if graduation is the only criteria then what is basic point of conducting entrance exam

    do this on first come first serve basis

    ReplyDelete
  5. Gr8 job sir.thank u so much..i am with u.i will mail u

    ReplyDelete
  6. You are doing great job. I am an MBA, so I didn't worry more about it, but I knew many of people have been preparing for ibps and they don't have 60% due to various genuine reasons like college, different type of examination...etc even they were good students. Hope IBPS will withdraw this notification and give new one soon.

    ReplyDelete
  7. i m also with u

    ReplyDelete
  8. AGE LIMIT SHOULD BE BASED ON BEGINNING OF YEAR i.e 1st JANUARY

    ReplyDelete
  9. please pin this topic

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yes this changes a lot of lives... Those are waiting for IBPS PO III are very disappointed.
    I am also with you.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yes Dileep thats it i am with you
    It humiliates me from po1 to till now
    i mail you

    ReplyDelete
  12. I m also victim of this new criteria of IBPS,,, m also with all of u,,, Gud move,,, get up now

    ReplyDelete
  13. Dear frnd....please add this points during PIL petition, and also collect case winning points from other friend and advocates.... sudden change of eligibility in po3 is not fair and
    unjustice.. in india 70% candidate have village and rural background, so
    60% marks is too much, eligibility should be based on current IQ
    level, even IAS, IPS only need graduation.. and also in IAS,IPS EXAMS if
    any change in pattern they will inform one year before , so that
    candidates would prepare for that changes, but in ibps didnt give any
    information last year, it is really unjustice for economically backward candidates who couldn’t pursue professional courses by spending lakhs of rupees where getting 60% would be easy when compare to traditional graduation.. its slap to poor student if IBPS thinks the percentage is enough to determine the talent in competition exams

    ReplyDelete
  14. I am with u i will mail u soon...

    ReplyDelete
  15. DEAR MR. DILEEP
    I AM ALSO A VICTIM OF THIS CHANGE. I AM PREPARING FOR THIS JOB FOR LAST 1 YEAR AND NOW I DONT KNOW WHAT TO DO.
    NOTHING IS HAPPENED WITH RTI- FROM RTI U CAN GET ONLY INFORMATION.
    THERE IS ONLY ONE WAY TO STOP THIS IS TO FILE A PETITION IN COURT. NO ONE IS GOING TO HELP US EXCEPT COURT. ONLY THEY HAVE POWER TO STOP THIS. IF ANY ONE CAN FILE A CASE IN COURT THEN DEFINITELY IT WILL BE FRUITFULL FOR US. CAREER ON MORE THEN 5 LAKHS STUDENT ARE ON RISK.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Even I am you, SBI Being one of the best has a simple eligibility Criteria for PO as well as Clerk

    ReplyDelete
  17. I am with you sir

    ReplyDelete
  18. Although am not a victim but at least IBPS should have declared the change in eligibility just after their last recruitment procedure so that many of those ambitious preparing candidates would have some other choice.

    ReplyDelete
  19. please do something i already mailed you

    ReplyDelete
  20. I fail to understand the IBPS policy of implementing 60 % as the eligibility criteria .I know some of my friend who have more than 60 % in their graduation and they fail to qualify even the ibps clerk exam .So according to my understanding a person having 59 % or even lower than that as competent or I must say more competent than one having 60 % in their graduation

    ReplyDelete
  21. I agree with percentage part of the notification but age can be considered till 30

    ReplyDelete
  22. i am and with all of our well wishers 100% commited to help u shoulder to shoulder.... together we can...
    dear admin please take our voices reach to the ear of ibps...

    ReplyDelete
  23. Dear adim

    i request you to please keep this post on front page

    ReplyDelete
  24. Khali IBPS nahin all govt officer jobs shd make 30yrs as upper age limit. SSC IB, postal jobs inme bhi 28yrs rakhe hain. Ye saale congress general logo ke liye kuch nahin karta. Harami kahinka. So guys vote for Modi and kick out this bloody COngress jiske wajaise unemployment badhta jaa raha he.

    ReplyDelete
  25. i'm qualified for this exam but i'm with you.
    All the Best

    Jaggi.
    Chandigarh

    ReplyDelete
  26. I m with u. Frnd.i m also suffring from this rule.we should protest it..we want justice fnd.ibps go back

    ReplyDelete
  27. I also think that 28 years age is lesser for an officer.The age limit should be restored to 30years.Think of a situation in which a B TECH graduate after going for an MBA or an M TECH applying for this post.He/She will be 25-26years old.This means only 1-2 chance for him which is injustice.I also support for restoring percentage marks too..

    ReplyDelete
  28. This criteria is demand of time.i welcome this move of ibps

    ReplyDelete
  29. i support you. they charge 600rs for exam . too expensive

    ReplyDelete
  30. I am with you sir. I am also victim of this change. so many aspirants are struggling with new changes in IBPS PO

    ReplyDelete
  31. India mei yahi prblm h. Eligible koi ni hona chahta . Koi acha move h to against ho jaenge. I welcum dis move by ibps.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Zyada Reformist dikhne ki zaroorat nahi hai .......India me kafi problems hai.....tere pas sabka solution hai kya ? K.V. Kamath commitee bhi itne fleeting statements nahi deti jitni tu de raha hai ................I am not affected but I protest the move .......

      Delete
  32. Bank hiring in 2014-15: No advantage for those who have cleared exams.


    The new vacancies to be filled by banks during 2014-15 will be based on the new recruitment process, according to the Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS).

    “Vacancies for 2014-15 are to be filled through subsequent rounds of common exams and interviews. Notification for POs/MTS-III has already been issued. The existing candidates, if qualified under PO-II or the clerical common written exams, will not be considered for recruitment for vacancies under 2014-15. They will have to write the
    exams again subject to eligibility,’’ Anup Bhatacharya, Director, IBPS told on Wednesday.

    Abhinav Chhabra

    ReplyDelete
  33. Ours' is a competitive world.
    So, I am with IBPS.

    btw, the fees for the exam (Rs.600/-) is too much.

    ReplyDelete
  34. http://epaper.jagran.com/epaper/13-jul-2013-84-patna-edition-patna-nager.html

    everybody see page 4 of e paper. hats off to patna students. hoping that old criteria is restored

    ReplyDelete
  35. I am with u sir
    n u r doing a ryt petition lga kr
    qki mai already bank me hu par ye unlog ko unjustice h jo po bnna chahte h private job chod kr govt field me ana chahte hai
    sath he jab upsc or psc,sbi po,ssc me %criteria ni hota toh fir ibps q???
    aap ye nhi keh skte k 60% k upar wala banda intelligent h ya far superior hai qki percentage na bnne k kai reason hote har university alag patern par chalti hai ??so dis is wrong move by ibps

    ReplyDelete
  36. Please Dileep, also do this on PO 2 Exam. Even after qualifying in Interview, IBPS Or Banks do not give any Guarantee that All PO 2 Interview Qualifiers will surely get Appointment now or later.

    ReplyDelete
  37. the CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA RBI ,India,s largest public sector bank SBI has no such restriction in recruiting OFFICERS and office assistants . IBPS should be banned..

    ReplyDelete
  38. hello Dileep I am with u I am also victim of these new eligibility criteria, I live in Allahabad & I also going to file PIL in Allahabad high court can U mail me the draft of PIL on my email id: sunilsingh24april@yahoo.co.in

    ReplyDelete
  39. i m also with u sir.. that criteria is not good we can't judge the person's skill on just percentage..

    ReplyDelete
  40. sir, me and my friend with u.......thanks for support us.

    ReplyDelete
  41. i m also with u sir.. that criteria is not good we can't judge the person's skill on just percentage..

    ReplyDelete
  42. Yes dileep i support you in this regrd as i am an unfortunate housewife whos spent almost about 2yrs towards my family commitments....simultaniuosly preparing for the ibps...i missed by just 2 marks in general awareness in ibps-1 and in ibps i was not able to get qualified in po2 due to the self mistake which i did in tension even getting a very gud score in other subjects i last by same 2 marks in eng...inspite of tht i was motivated to try again but suddenly they changed their policies in recruitment....thru reducing the age limit....all my dreams were wiped off...all of a sudden...feeling blank :-):-):-):-)..anyways thax were bringing up the issue..as i am the biggest victim of the ongoing prob:-):-):-) n i am with u my friend...its gr8 to join hands vth the team.....n lets hope for the best:-):-):-)

    ReplyDelete
  43. THOUGH I QUALIFY FOR IBPS PO3 I AM COMPLETELY WITH THIS MOVEMENT..THOSE WHO ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS MOVEMENT ARE SIMPLY AFRAID OF COMPETITION...PLEASE GO AHEAD MR DIELEEP.PLEASE CONTACT ME IN CASE YOU NEED ANY SORT OF ASSISTANCE.I WILL TRY MY LEVEL BEST TO SUPPORT THIS MOVEMENT.

    THANKS

    ReplyDelete
  44. This is a bad news to the people who are preparing for IBPS...

    ReplyDelete
  45. here the candidates are arguing according to their own needs.those who were not eligible due to age are blaming at age qualification and those who were not eligible due to less marks are blaming at % of cutoff marks fixed by ibps. All after this you should remember that this is an officer exam not clerical.so 60% in graduation is legit. do you remember one thing, in ibps clerk 1 the min. qualification was intermediate but when it comes to ibps clerk 2 the min qualification was graduation. at that time why these people haven't raised their voices.why means most of them were of qualified graduates & they didn't want the intermediate candidates to be in competition. so guys, ibps making all these changes according to the vacancies & competition level. For your information, the minimum education qualification for ibps clerk2 was graduation & at that time for sbi it was just intermediate.at that time howmany of you have raised their voices against the ibps clerk2? the only thing which i accept with you guys is,ibps should have informed informed about these changes atleast 6 months prior to the announcement of notification. so guys,here you're not the only person in the competition.take everyone & everything into consideration.don't judge according to your own needs.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Well i thing for a change there have to be a mechanism. You cant change eligibility suddenly there should be prior notification and candidates should be informed atleast a year ago to make necassary adjustments. Hopefuly govt or courts will look into it and come up with sum solution

    ReplyDelete
  47. people are raising objection because ibps did not declare new criteria in advance.they should have put new rules on their website in october 12. aspirants were unaware of new rules and they preparing keeping old eligibility in mind. how can ibps be so irresponsible? now many would say that banking sites discussed it in october 12.but let me ask them how many aspirants are active net users?ibps is totally responsible for this mess. when all gradutes were eligible attrition was 30% , now it will be over 50% because any one with 60% in graduation will get more opportunity. the banks are putting criteria like navratna companies(which they are not). all similar posts or even superior to bank po have no criteria
    1.ias
    2.pcs
    3.lic gic
    4.ssc cgl
    5 mha recently released ad

    in rbi 60% can be justified as seats are too less.similar logic can be aplied to fci mgmt trainee
    ibps has denied chance to lakhs of graduates

    why criteria should be there for 20000 posts when unemployment is at such a high level?

    ReplyDelete
  48. NO ONE HAS READ ABOUT THE PROTEST IN PATNA AGAINST THIS CHANGE
    PLEASE READ THIS AND TRY TO SUPPORT THEM

    http://epaper.jagran.com/epaperimages/13072013/patna/12pat-pg4-0.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  49. Dear Sir,
    I have mailed you at both the id's having the following points-

    Thanks for filing a case against IBPS PO new criteria of 60% and decreased age limit of 28, as I am preparing since last 5 months fell deprived and shocked after the new rule. I have already complained it to govt , but no action has been taken .FILE ATTACHED IN MAIL



    My points are that to GOVT , for which no action taken -

    (1) As per the notification No. 10/30/3/2012-IR by Dept. of Financial services, Ministry of Finance, Government of India the age limit for bank PO has been reduced to 28yrs from 30yrs. Which is applicable from IBPS PO-3. Even if you age is 28yrs 1 month old you won't be able to apply under general category. This sudden change in rule if effect many bank aspirants like me. Wish Govt. brings the age back to 30yrs. Or some should challenge this sudden change in rule in the court...



    (2) Individual bank exams are better tham ibps . . . ibps ruining opportunities of unemployed . . .EXAMPLE:- for gre n toefl, the committee is unable to allot slots for students , then How can we expect for 40 lakhs aspirants in PO? . . . it never helpful for people. . . As per my above two complaints , you are requested to -



    (a) withdraw if any such changes are going to be happen ,



    (b) give age limit 30 for both bank clerk and PO exam , as retirement age has already increased by central govt.



    (c) Keep gratuation pass ( no percentage bar ) for both clerk and PO . After all a graduate having much gravity and personality than a HS passed school boy .



    (d) One exam i.e IBPS in one year is not good . Some times some brilliant candidate may not appear for various reason , in that case he has to wait a long one year , and age also increases , and sometime they can't appear for the age limit .



    (e) Rather it should be every bank has their own exam , so that people get as many attempt to sit . Don't Govt want to give this opportunity ? We dont want a prediction of IBPS boards of exams and selections .



    (f) Already unemployment become a big problem in India , so why not give everyone a chance , so that later Govt. will not get criticized .



    WISH YOU ALL THE BEST SIR .YOU WILL WIN THE CASE



    Thank You

    ReplyDelete
  50. if we want to change this criteria we hav to protest it at mass level just like upsc controversy....we hav to do it fast at national level bcoz lakh of students will affect from this immature decision...they want aggregate 60% in grad.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Pls do it early sir ...so many people are loading by this....before the online application date compleate...pls..

    ReplyDelete
  52. Here i would like to point out IBPS people's sense.For RRB scale 1 officer, qualification is degree without any percentage restrictions but for IBPS PO, qualification is degree with 60% marks.About age, for RRB scale 1 officer age should between 18-28 but for PO age should between 20-28.I don't understand the logic behind setting different age and marks criteria for the same scale 1 officer to be recruited in RRBs and Nationalised Banks.

    ReplyDelete
  53. In my point of view,everyone has to be equal opportunity .There may be many reasons to not to score good marks in academic .Also graduation of different streams and different universities cannot be compared .And those who thinks 60% marks are mandatory to be PO and they are much able than others than why they donot have courage to face the competition.

    Sir,Please continue the protest and wish you good luck

    ReplyDelete
  54. hum aapke sath h sir.....aap bol dena bus site hum teyar h.....aag lga denge ibps ko....

    ReplyDelete
  55. i m with u sir..thanku soo much for supporting us :)

    ReplyDelete
  56. thanks sir...plz do it soon..before over the registration date ..plzzzz plzzzzz... i m preparing for 1 year.. n very disappointed now...

    ReplyDelete
  57. Yes I am also in support for you.. The congress government is playing with the lives of millions of young Indians, only for the sake of vote bank politics and for there own interests. Even when there is likely opportunity for better future for the youths in Government jobs, peoples like P Chidambaram, finds place to play politics in it... Who with there curroupt earnings, can send there son for foreign education and bring them back to hold lucrative government posts. And continue there domination on the poor, youths and the masses with there draculian powers. They can change the law for there own interest, any time, with will and devoid us from our rights to live a better life...

    People who do not support this disgraceful and unjust decision to decrese the max age limit to 28 and 60% percentile in degree, should support this noble step taken by Mr Dileep Bhat.

    Thanks a lot Dileep Sir,
    We are with you.

    ReplyDelete
  58. I am with you Sir..

    Hum apna HAQ lekar rahenge.

    SADDA HAQ ITTHE RAKH.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Nice move. I am with you.

    ReplyDelete
  60. many of us saying that it is injustice but that is our fault they have the rights to decide the eligibility criteria...thos persons who dint get 60% dint study wel..in deir graduation..dont blame the govt or ibps its ur fault...

    ReplyDelete
  61. ibps clerk aur ibps po dono ki age 30 hona chahiye aaiye milkr protest krte he

    ReplyDelete
  62. ibps clerk ki age 30 aur ibps po ki age 32 hona chahiye aaiye milkr protest kre bhai tumhara mobile no. ya email id dena apn dono milkr ek file court me pil krte he

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...